For when you or other people start comparing apples to apples with washing machines on their back.
I started this campaign is for those that like to judge. Judging it good. It keeps us alive. It stops us making bad decisions. But sometimes because it is bad. But I completely understand why you do not want to take the risk, the first time.
I would like you to think about the second time. The time when you see an abled bodied man or woman - just chilling. It's day time. And you knock on their door. You think, "their nothing wrong with this guy". "Nothing a hard days work would not cure". And then as justification, you delete what they told you from your report. Just because.
And when you are asked why, you lie, hide behind your friends director, and the weight of your institution. And you would not be the first.
You would join, courts, social services, partners, family, doctors, psychologists, and other councils. If they were right, I can lie.
But lets flip it. If I can lie and be protected, could they have lied to? Is my punishment justified? Does 6 years of not answering housing emails mean it is okay to evict someone? Wait. If this guy is so bad, why isn't he in jail? This seems a lot of shit without a criminal record.
How can this guy be repeatedly accused of serious crimes - but no record. And where is the evidence in these reports?
The real question is are you part of the problem or part of the solution?
That is what I try to understand each day. How people can treat others as less that human. Less than because of what someone else says, without evidence. Well that is what the others did. They just copy paste.Please stop copy and pasting what you have read, as if it is real.
Context
Daniel Reynard came to my home on 11 Sept 2025. He was intent on evicting me. And he made sure of this by ignoring my health and circumstances in his report. Which then allowed him to serve a notice of seeking possession. Health and circumstances are required by law for a possession claim under the Housing Act 1985, and so is fairness. So when I told Daniel Reynard when he excluded my health and circumstances and wanted to hand me a letter he was just trying to evict me.The lie
I know this, and it can be inferred from the following. In his report about the 11 Sept 2025 meeting he mentions nothing about my health or circumstances. That report is here on the video, the audio is the interview: https://youtu.be/u4w1MtAEKB0 But I told him. So it is deliberate with knowledge. In short I say:"00:22 see. So l'm suffering from depression and anxiety. It's making my communication with the universal credit very difficult. I also am going for an autism exam at the moment. So there's lots of things happening with me, yeah, ADHD, and I've got dyslexia, the issue with Universal Credit, and Sarah kind of helped me with it, was that they seemed to put everybody through the same peg hole"
Then he writes:
"Notes - Mr did open the door to me apone my second time of knocking. He was very confedent when he was speaking to me and stood for around 10-15 minutes unadded. He looked very well kept and the property was clean and tidy." SIC he is dyslexic.
Criminal consequences
This is a lie of omission. He omits my health. He knows, I said one thing and he writes something else. It is a serious lie. But importantly it only becomes criminal offence when leads to a serious out come. Because he then serves a notice of seeking possession based on the lie. A NOSP is a serious step. It means that Cambridge can make a claim to the court. He knows health and circumstances are important. Because if they were not, he would have put them in the report. Further Cambridge's Income policy requires health to be attached for a warrant to the director, "Does the tenant have mental health issues? Yes No". If Daniel leaves health out the direct will not ask. The director is Anna Hill. She definitely will not ask.Deliberate?
I asked him why he lied, he directed me to 6 years of unanswered messages from the housing team."On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 at 12:43, Daniel.Reynard@cambridge.gov.uk wrote: Hì Ryan I hope you are well. Please direct your enquiry to HousingOfficer@cambridge.gov.uk Kind Regards Daniel Reynard ,Income Officer, Cambridge City Council"
What this mean was to go away we can do what we want
HousingOfficer@cambridge.gov.uk Inbox 18 out 0 back 6 years.
Zero Messages received
18 Messages sent.
This misdirection suggests deliberate intent. Instead of a not answering. He directed me to years of abuse. No one in housing has responded to 18 messages, since
He does not want the arrears. My arrears are with UC, held open by a High Court order 27 May 2025. He knows Carla Buey lying, here https://youtu.be/DgBSBlyIYBU . #Badfaith.
Comments
Post a Comment