Skip to main content

Watch failure - Cambridge Jobcentre Plus delays easy fix to housing

The Hidden Scandal: How Cambridge Jobcentre Ignored a Three-Month Mistake

Welcome back to Universal Credit hell. Today, we are unpacking another lawless failure from my partner's journal—a simple mistake that Cambridge Jobcentre Plus allowed to cause three months of financial hardship, and a legal request they chose to ignore.



The Problem: A Lie Written into the System

The situation was straightforward. My partner lives in a shared house with three flatmates. But when Universal Credit calculated her housing costs, they didn't see flatmates. They saw "family members."

This wasn't just a clerical error. It was a lie written into the system. It meant that because she was out of work, the DWP's calculation wrongly assumed her "family" would pay her share. Her flatmates were now financially responsible for her in the eyes of the DWP. A bigger problem is that nothing we said could make the Cambridge team understand this basic reality.

The Inaction: A Mandatory Reconsideration Ignored

She told them about the error. She told them again. She told them a third time.

After being ignored, she put a formal **Mandatory Reconsideration request** in her journal. This is a claimant's legal right, the first step in any appeal. It is not optional. It cannot be ignored.

Cambridge Jobcentre Plus ignored it. For three months.

This highlights a staggering lawlessness:

  • A failure to understand that three people on a tenancy are not automatically family.
  • A failure to correct this basic fact when told about it at an interview.
  • A deliberate failure to recognise a formal, legal request to reconsider a decision.

Why This Matters

This isn't just about one Jobcentre. I see stories like this happening all over the country. It is a culture of delay and unaccountability that is baked into a broken system.

Help me fight to change this. Help me hold this Jobcentre, and others like it, to account.

Fundraising is coming soon. To see the full story and all the evidence from our three court cases, please visit the main campaign website:

https://ryanvcambridgejobcentreplus.blogspot.com/

#UniversalCredit #DWP #Cambridge #Jobcentre #MandatoryReconsideration #SocialJustice

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

25 Oct 2025 Ryan v SSWP or Ryan v Cambridge City Council.

I have a dilemma I have only so many spoons. Do I make another High Court Claim for CCC or SSWP or do I just report Carla B to the police? You have my permission to use AI to read this post. I have decided to put a criminal case together for Carla B, the Customer Service Team Leader in the Cambridge Job Centre. I have never done criminal law before. But I do know if two white police officers from Parkside come to your home, to hand deliver a letter, and read it to you (perhaps because you are dyslexic) so that the can personally tell you  that they will not investigate the racist comments made that you  recorded. This is because they asked them and they sad they did not say that. But importantly the police officers have their cameras on, without telling you for their protection (without telling you) which is very criminal. So you smile and show them your partner watching on the IPAD, and later ask for the Video via GDPR. That sort of crime is obvious because is it is very...
Post a Comment
Read more

DWP Lies Exposed: How I Forced Cambridge Jobcentre to Action

The Smoking Gun: How a Discrimination Claim Forced the DWP to Obey Its Own Rules The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and its local Jobcentre staff use lies and obstruction to deny claimants their rights. This isn't an opinion; it's a fact backed by evidence. This post contains the story from my own Universal Credit journal, showing the systemic failure at Cambridge Jobcentre Plus. The Standoff: A Claim Held Hostage For months, my Universal Credit claim was blocked. The official reason? They couldn't verify my identity. The real reason? They refused to follow their own rules. As detailed in the video above, they ignored my consent given in my journal. They refused help from the council, who had already verified me. They insisted on processes that were impossible for me to complete due to my disabilities, despite my repeated requests for a reasonable adjustment. This went on for months. It was a deliberate strategy of delay. The Turning Point: Direct Actio...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Day in the Journal: April 5th - The Broken System at Day One

A Day in the Journal: April 5th - The Broken System at Day One My Universal Credit claim began on April 5th, 2025. It began with a broken door. The very first, and most critical, step—verifying my identity—was an impossible task designed by a system that doesn't talk to itself. For nearly two hours, I was stuck in a loop, trying to use the GOV.UK Verify system as instructed by the Universal Credit portal. The system repeatedly failed, but I kept trying because the alternative it offered was a telephone call—a method of communication that is extremely difficult for me due to my disabilities. After completing every other section of the application, from housing to health, the system finally logged a crucial, but false, confirmation. The Ghost in the Machine At 11:16 PM on the night my claim was submitted, my Universal Credit journal was updated with a single, misleading line: Journal Entry: 5 Apr 2025 at 11:16pm "Confirm your identity completed" I...
Post a Comment
Read more