I received a summons from Cambridge city council because I was busy trying not to be evicted and trying to get the court to accept my claim against Carla Buey. She and the the housing team from Cambridge City council decided that they would try to evict me. You have seen the Daniel Reynard video of his unannounced visits. Daniel reynard first tried to illegally evict me on 11 Sept 2026 . Before I give a template for (my only income is PIP please give me a 100% Ctax discount) below - let me explain how universal credit Cambridge staff, and Cambridge city council staff tried to illegally evict me. Basically Council's cannot start evictions if your are unwell, entitled to universal credit, and if there are any problems with equality act, human rights. That is the Pre-Action Protocol for Possession Claims by Social Landlords . So what Daniel Reynard did was to create a report stating that I was well, and did not include the problems I told him. He, and the council, knew that I w...
My three court cases for access to universal credit and the court lies that over shadowed that of Carla Buey and Daniel Reynard and Anna Hill
Today I have mediation with the DWP and GLD, not the person that I sued. She Carla Buey is at home. So while I wait by the phone between 2 and 4pm she is sunning herself. In this my third case to get universal credit, my two minders Niamh Sherwood and Alfie Giddings of the GLD lie in wait. Their job is to lie in court to delay my claim until the court finally throws it out. But no matter what they say, right or wrong the case it thrown out. That is the court's deal with the GLD, Government Legal Department. Here is something that the Niamh Sherwood wrote in a reply to my email asking why is Alfie Giddings, misleading the court. I put that response below Today is the 9 of July 2026, 4 days after the court should have served the claim form at Carla Buey's house, and her solicitors. My application was made in time on the 8 May 2026 to reserve the claim form at at her home. But this post is not about the court removing that application because it had too many pages, under PD5B. A ...