Ryan v Cambridge Jobcentre Plus

This is the conduct complaint I made about Daniel Zeichner’s alleged corruption of a Parliamentary Health and Services officer .  Daniel Zeichner tells her that a final letter is needed. And then she confirms this. The problem is that a final letter is not always needed, says the PSHO guidance and the complaint I made.  And yet the PHSO officer never mentions this exception and claimed to have processed the form and rejected it. She has not obviously.  The way Daniel Zeichner I allege frustrated the complaint to the PHSO by refusing to sign the form. He said he refereed it. The problem with this is that PHSO will refuse any complaint that is not signed. This complaint was refused by the house or commons complaints team.

These are a few of the tricks that Police say to stop answering a serious complaints,  logging it or referring it back to the IOPC. The last point is what to do in reply to a refusal to do this. The first is the misstake. First the context. I made a police corruption complaint in July 2026 to the IOPC. Although police corruption complaints are handled by the IOPC not the local police, it was sent to Bedfordshire police. Context over. To stop logging the compliant the officer asked me to reformat the complaint. She refused to log the complaint and refer it back to the IOPC, I then waited as she did not answer. What I should have done was turn written the complain ready to be turned into a letter before action. As I had not and did not know the exact policy I just delayed. When I next encountered a similar refusal from Cambridgeshire this i did this to ask for the complaint to be processed.  https://ryanvcambridgejobcentreplus.blogspot.com/p/cambridgshire-police-timeline.html Th...

It is hard to sound normal when talking about things that do not make sense. Here, as part of a new series towards my application the ECHR, I will be publishing strange emails from UK government organisations. They say anything not to process a complaint. This one is from Parliament who the court has no jurisdiction over. In short they get wrong: - Not able to process a conduct complaint because it is case work - and ignoring this is overridden by my allegation of paragraph 11 house into disrepute. - Not able to take an allegation that Daniel Zeichner has brought the house into disrepute because that allegation is a “High bar” - when only an allegation is needed with evidence - Not able to make a complain about failing to progress a conduct complaint because the complaint process is not for that - without highlighting the review process instead The email chain from house of commons commissioner is on this page. It is a complaint about Daniel Zeichner, not providing help in a humiliatin...

Cambridge Jobcentre Uses Wrong "Medical Evidence Criteria" for LCWRA Instead of Correct DWP "Medical Evidence Including Fit Notes" and "Closing the Health Journey When a Fit Note Has Expired" Please sign my petition to make the DWP stop deleting complaints without your knowledge: Sign the Petition on 38 Degrees Introduction: Cambridge Jobcentre's Fictitious Guidance In another instance of Cambridge Jobcentre's dishonesty, they have once again referenced guidance that does not exist. The correct guidance documents are "Medical evidence including fit notes" and "Closing the health journey when a fit note has expired." Previously, they applied fictitious criteria to terminate a Limited Capability for Work and Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) claim for my partner—a matter that remains before the Upper Tribunal. This arose because the Cambridge office failed to initiate her health journey during the COVID-19 pandemic, a mistake ...

 # Letter may be edited. Last edit To:   - Councillor Jenny Gawthrope Wood (Kings Hedges Ward)   - Councillor Delowar Hossain (Kings Hedges Ward)   - Councillor Martin Smart (Kings Hedges Ward)   CC:   - The Monitoring Officer, Cambridge City Council   - Robert Pollock, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Cambridge City Council   - The Head of Housing Services, Cambridge City Council   --- Dear Councillors, I am writing to complain about Daniel Reynard, Anna Hill, and Sarah Cafferkey before I apply for an injunction. The injunction will include Carla Buey. I am now publicly asking the councillors to help me with this, so I do not have to apply for an injunction. This is because it is your duty to put forward complaints and grievances to the council and advocate on my behalf.  But last time I asked, councillors were told by Anna Hill not to help. The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) states there was a du...

 I received a summons from Cambridge city council because I was busy trying not to be evicted and trying to get the court to accept my claim against Carla Buey. She and the the housing team from Cambridge City council decided that they would try to evict me. You have seen the Daniel Reynard video of his unannounced visits. Daniel reynard first tried to illegally evict me on 11 Sept 2026 .  Before I give a template for (my only income is PIP please give me a 100% Ctax discount) below - let me explain how universal credit Cambridge staff, and Cambridge city council staff tried to illegally evict me. Basically Council's cannot start evictions if your are unwell, entitled to universal credit, and if there are any problems with equality act, human rights. That is the Pre-Action Protocol for Possession Claims by Social Landlords . So what Daniel Reynard did was to create a report stating that I was well, and did not include the problems I told him. He, and the council, knew that I w...