Ryan v Cambridge Jobcentre Plus

Introduce a statutory duty to track and notify DWP complaints We want the UK Government to introduce a statutory duty requiring the DWP to notify claimants about their complaint. Digitally or in writing at every stage. Including opened, escalated, or changed, and to legally prohibit closure of any complaint without a claimant's explicit, recorded consent. The current DWP complaints system lacks transparency, has poor tracking. Claimants often have no formal record when a complaint is made, making it difficult to get a fair resolution. Not only is MPs' time taken up with complaint administration to the DWP, the DWP must spent time updating claimants as to the progress of a complaint. Accessible complaints will address serious concerns from coroners, safeguarding bodies, human rights, and disability organisations - who protect rights and lives. Sign the petition

Formal complaint to GLD DWP, SRA, and Cilex, Dated 12 June 2026 by email  Encl 9 June 2025 DWP Submission to high court by GLD DWP stating that email cannot be used. 25 June 2025 Cambridge email identifying me by email Dear GLD, SRA and Cilex I am writing to complain about the GLD DWP staff interfering in my claim for disability access to Universal Credit. Ironically, to deny my access to UC, they are also denying me access to a court. As well as misleading me, they have misled DWP staff in jobcentres. This has likely led to deaths because the advice was woefully incorrect. My guess is that say whatever they want, because they have the court. This is based on a first-hand conversation from the court staff and the outrageous claims made. Expanded below, these quotes are wrong in law. PIP regulation 88 does not exist. They claim that the DWP is immune from the Equality Act 2010. And that because the DWP is an employer t...

For when you or other people start comparing apples to apples with washing machines on their back. I started this campaign is for those that like to judge. Judging it good. It keeps us alive. It stops us making bad decisions. But sometimes because it is bad. But I completely understand why you do not want to take the risk, the first time. I would like you to think about the second time. The time when you see an abled bodied man or woman - just chilling. It's day time. And you knock on their door. You think, "their nothing wrong with this guy". "Nothing a hard days work would not cure". And then as justification, you delete what they told you from your report. Just because. And when you are asked why, you lie, hide behind your friends director, and the weight of your institution. And you would not be the first. You would join, courts, social services, partners, family, doctors, psychologists, and other councils. If they were right, I can lie. But lets flip ...

Share this video I am being evicted because UC Cambridge Carla Buey was sued by me on the 20 June 2025 for not following DWP guidance. This video tells that story. This is beyond benefit discrimination The SSWP refused to accept my information on paper, or uploaded, or by post. They want me to state it verbally because of a UC policy. But the Welfare Reform Act “wra” does not have this limitation. In this movie I show how UC used the same power, to use email and ID me by my landlord. And they can used this now. What I do not show in the video is that the WRA does not event need attendance. Like PIP for example. Universal credit can remove the attendance that Carla Buey wants. There is nothing in the WRA 2012 that says you must attend. But Carla Buey is running the show based on a policy. It is funny that she could not follow a policy on the 10 or 11 June 2025 until she was sued. Thousands of people are rejected from benefits because they failed to attend. And then there claim ...

I am being evicted because UC Cambridge Carla Buey was sued by me on the 20 June 2025 for not following DWP guidance. This video tells that story. The SSWP refused to accept my information on paper, or uploaded, or by post. They want me to state it verbally because of a UC policy.  But the Welfare Reform Act does not have this limitation. In this movie I show how UC used the same power, to use email and ID me by my landlord. And they can used this now.  What I do not show in the video is that the WRA does not event need attendance, The attendance that Carla Buey wants. There is nothing in the WRA 2012 that says you must attend. But Carla Buey is running the show based on a policy.  It is funny that she could not follow a policy on the 10 or 11 June 2025 until she was sued. Thousands of people are rejected from benefits because they failed to attend. And then there claim is closed. But there is not law for claim closure. Some are taught wrong, and know nothing better. But ...

Press Release: Official Statement from Ryan FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 27 December 2025 "They Deleted My Health to Evict Me": Ryan Releases Video Evidence of Alleged Council and DWP Deception CAMBRIDGE, UK — I am Ryan, a disabled resident of Cambridge for six years. This press release marks the start of a legal campaign against Cambridge and DWP. The first on has a High Court order holding my claim open until UC finish. I know need second one to get UC to accept my evidence, and Cambridge to stop their possession order. The Campaign This new campaign is necessary because of the lies. First UC lied they could not ID me by email. Now they lie they the cannot accept my evidence in writing. Thus again holding up my rent payment being released. But instead of Canbridge backing my need for UC to make reasonable adjustments, they blame a non interference policy, and then faked a report. The evidence that the report is a lie, is the difference between the report and meeting recorded. The...