Ryan v Cambridge Jobcentre Plus

For when you or other people start comparing apples to apples with washing machines on their back. I started this campaign is for those that like to judge. Judging it good. It keeps us alive. It stops us making bad decisions. But sometimes because it is bad. But I completely understand why you do not want to take the risk, the first time. I would like you to think about the second time. The time when you see an abled bodied man or woman - just chilling. It's day time. And you knock on their door. You think, "their nothing wrong with this guy". "Nothing a hard days work would not cure". And then as justification, you delete what they told you from your report. Just because. And when you are asked why, you lie, hide behind your friends director, and the weight of your institution. And you would not be the first. You would join, courts, social services, partners, family, doctors, psychologists, and other councils. If they were right, I can lie. But lets flip ...

Share this video I am being evicted because UC Cambridge Carla Buey was sued by me on the 20 June 2025 for not following DWP guidance. This video tells that story. This is beyond benefit discrimination The SSWP refused to accept my information on paper, or uploaded, or by post. They want me to state it verbally because of a UC policy. But the Welfare Reform Act “wra” does not have this limitation. In this movie I show how UC used the same power, to use email and ID me by my landlord. And they can used this now. What I do not show in the video is that the WRA does not event need attendance. Like PIP for example. Universal credit can remove the attendance that Carla Buey wants. There is nothing in the WRA 2012 that says you must attend. But Carla Buey is running the show based on a policy. It is funny that she could not follow a policy on the 10 or 11 June 2025 until she was sued. Thousands of people are rejected from benefits because they failed to attend. And then there claim ...

I am being evicted because UC Cambridge Carla Buey was sued by me on the 20 June 2025 for not following DWP guidance. This video tells that story. The SSWP refused to accept my information on paper, or uploaded, or by post. They want me to state it verbally because of a UC policy.  But the Welfare Reform Act does not have this limitation. In this movie I show how UC used the same power, to use email and ID me by my landlord. And they can used this now.  What I do not show in the video is that the WRA does not event need attendance, The attendance that Carla Buey wants. There is nothing in the WRA 2012 that says you must attend. But Carla Buey is running the show based on a policy.  It is funny that she could not follow a policy on the 10 or 11 June 2025 until she was sued. Thousands of people are rejected from benefits because they failed to attend. And then there claim is closed. But there is not law for claim closure. Some are taught wrong, and know nothing better. But ...

Press Release: Official Statement from Ryan FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 27 December 2025 "They Deleted My Health to Evict Me": Ryan Releases Video Evidence of Alleged Council and DWP Deception CAMBRIDGE, UK — I am Ryan, a disabled resident of Cambridge for six years. This press release marks the start of a legal campaign against Cambridge and DWP. The first on has a High Court order holding my claim open until UC finish. I know need second one to get UC to accept my evidence, and Cambridge to stop their possession order. The Campaign This new campaign is necessary because of the lies. First UC lied they could not ID me by email. Now they lie they the cannot accept my evidence in writing. Thus again holding up my rent payment being released. But instead of Canbridge backing my need for UC to make reasonable adjustments, they blame a non interference policy, and then faked a report. The evidence that the report is a lie, is the difference between the report and meeting recorded. The...

Not only a I facing corrupt DWP officers I am also facing a corrupt Cambridge City Council. Daniel Reynard Income officer from Cambridge pretending to bring a gift. He the lies and goes back to his office and lies again. In the youtube attached there are several lies: 1. he wants to know what happened. But he already knows really he is there to start the eviction process rolling. 2. He is there to honestly assess me. No he does not even say that.  3. He is going to report my health accurately. But does not. The reason health matters, is the same reason he did not write it down properly. No health mean he can evict me faster and it is more painful to challenge. Daniel Reynard was defended by Anna Hill Sue Amna  Daniel Reynard (Income Officer): On 11 September 2025, omitted the claimant's disclosed disabilities (ADHD, dyslexia, depression, anxiety, potential autism) from his report; assessed only physical presentation ("stood for around 10-15 minutes unaided") which is irre...

  Ryan 16 December 2025 at 13:17 To: Robert Robert Pollock <Robert.pollock@cambridge.gov.uk>, New Proceedings <newproceedings@governmentlegal.gov.uk> Cc: ACORN Cambridge <cambridge@acorntheunion.org.uk>, Daniel Zeichner <daniel@danielzeichner.co.uk>, Daniel <daniel  @cambridge.gov.uk> As promised, in an earlier email, I have now published the video of Daniel. The importance of this video is that omitting health from an assessment is a lie. This lie was material in that it is required by the court and the director to make an assessment, as per your income policy.  I will now continue to publish other documents from the DWP and the Council, that show the lies of the legal teams, DWP and 3C services in this claim.   The video of Daniel omitting my health from his report is here. https://youtu.be/u4w1MtAEKB0 The social media post making the video live is here. https://bsky.app/profile/ ryanvcambridgejcp.bsk...