Skip to main content

Carla Buey DWP UC Cambridge lying about universal credit ability to use email


Share this video I am being evicted because UC Cambridge Carla Buey was sued by me on the 20 June 2025 for not following DWP guidance. This video tells that story. This is beyond benefit discrimination The SSWP refused to accept my information on paper, or uploaded, or by post. They want me to state it verbally because of a UC policy. But the Welfare Reform Act “wra” does not have this limitation. In this movie I show how UC used the same power, to use email and ID me by my landlord. And they can used this now. What I do not show in the video is that the WRA does not event need attendance. Like PIP for example. Universal credit can remove the attendance that Carla Buey wants. There is nothing in the WRA 2012 that says you must attend. But Carla Buey is running the show based on a policy. It is funny that she could not follow a policy on the 10 or 11 June 2025 until she was sued. Thousands of people are rejected from benefits because they failed to attend. And then there claim is closed. But there is not law for claim closure. Some are taught wrong, and know nothing better. But Carla Buey is just doing what she wants. And what she want is leading to my eviction. Ms Shah, Carla Buey, and Daniel Reynard (ex DWP) need to be made an example of. They think the rules do not apply to them. Fairness and equality are afterthoughts. Here on this channel you have evidence of three people lying in public officer, leading to my eviction. A serious matter, and a serious outcome. The SSWP are not only happy with lying in the first place, they are now letter Carla Buey dictate my claim. Where I have sued Carla. I do not think this can be possible. I then have Daniel Reynard sticking up for Carla Buey. And stating terms, when I mentions the equality act. And then he puts the boot in. He omits my health and starts possession. But none of his staff can explain why he does not included it. The true crimes The Crime of Misconduct in public officer requires dishonesty, or misconduct, and those must be serious, and the outcome serious. What is a Psychopath Carla misconducts about the equality act, and lies about the policy to ID by email with landlord. Serious conducts, and serious as my claim has bee delayed since 8April 2025. She adds to this by claiming that attendance is required by a policy. The act overrides any policy, and it another misconduct of the equality act and dishonesty, with now serious evictions. Ms Shah, with multiple duties to court, public, SRA, including the ordinary statutory duties of equality, she is actually worse that Carla if she does half as much. But she has not. Daniel Reynard, was directly involved in serving my eviction and deleting the required evidence to stop the eviction, my health. For my mental health and litigation fund I need you to share this, outrageous situation. Help stop my eviction just because i cannot attend a meeting but have asked to provide my evidence in writing. My blog https://ryanvcambridgejobcentreplus.blogspot.com My crowdfund https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/ryan-v-cambridge-jobcentre-plus-litigation-fund Join me #cambridge #ccc #UC #eviction #evictionhelp #mipo #danielzeichner #CPSreferal #sociopath #truecrimes #UniversalCredit #LitigationFund #pip

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The litigation campaign for Cambridge and UC Cambridge to treat me fairly is live

Press Release: Official Statement from Ryan FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 27 December 2025 "They Deleted My Health to Evict Me": Ryan Releases Video Evidence of Alleged Council and DWP Deception CAMBRIDGE, UK — I am Ryan, a disabled resident of Cambridge for six years. This press release marks the start of a legal campaign against Cambridge and DWP. The first on has a High Court order holding my claim open until UC finish. I know need second one to get UC to accept my evidence, and Cambridge to stop their possession order. The Campaign This new campaign is necessary because of the lies. First UC lied they could not ID me by email. Now they lie they the cannot accept my evidence in writing. Thus again holding up my rent payment being released. But instead of Canbridge backing my need for UC to make reasonable adjustments, they blame a non interference policy, and then faked a report. The evidence that the report is a lie, is the difference between the report and meeting recorded. The...

25 Oct 2025 Ryan v SSWP or Ryan v Cambridge City Council.

I have a dilemma I have only so many spoons. Do I make another High Court Claim for CCC or SSWP or do I just report Carla B to the police? You have my permission to use AI to read this post. I have decided to put a criminal case together for Carla B, the Customer Service Team Leader in the Cambridge Job Centre. I have never done criminal law before. But I do know if two white police officers from Parkside come to your home, to hand deliver a letter, and read it to you (perhaps because you are dyslexic) so that the can personally tell you  that they will not investigate the racist comments made that you  recorded. This is because they asked them and they sad they did not say that. But importantly the police officers have their cameras on, without telling you for their protection (without telling you) which is very criminal. So you smile and show them your partner watching on the IPAD, and later ask for the Video via GDPR. That sort of crime is obvious because is it is very...

Cambridge City Council Income Team continue eviction despite high court order

Not only a I facing corrupt DWP officers I am also facing a corrupt Cambridge City Council. Daniel Reynard Income officer from Cambridge pretending to bring a gift. He the lies and goes back to his office and lies again. In the youtube attached there are several lies: 1. he wants to know what happened. But he already knows really he is there to start the eviction process rolling. 2. He is there to honestly assess me. No he does not even say that.  3. He is going to report my health accurately. But does not. The reason health matters, is the same reason he did not write it down properly. No health mean he can evict me faster and it is more painful to challenge. Daniel Reynard was defended by Anna Hill Sue Amna  Daniel Reynard (Income Officer): On 11 September 2025, omitted the claimant's disclosed disabilities (ADHD, dyslexia, depression, anxiety, potential autism) from his report; assessed only physical presentation ("stood for around 10-15 minutes unaided") which is irre...