Skip to main content

A Day in the Journal: April 8th - The Day DWP Policy Contradicted Logic and Law

A Day in the Journal: April 8th - The Day DWP Policy Contradicted Logic and Law

Every so often, in the dense pages of a Universal Credit journal, a single day stands out. It’s a day where quiet, bureaucratic obstruction turns into a clear, stated refusal to follow the law. For me, one of those days was Tuesday, April 8th, 2025.

The issue was simple: as a disabled person, I had requested a reasonable adjustment to communicate via email, as is my right under the Equality Act 2010. The DWP's response was to schedule face-to-face and phone appointments that I could not manage. On April 8th, after I formally objected, managers from Cambridge Jobcentre put their unlawful position in writing.

The Official Refusal

At 8:49 AM, a manager named Louise gave the first clear refusal, stating they needed to "see" documents in person and offering a phone call as the only adjustment:

Journal Entry: 8 Apr 2025 at 8:49am

"Hi Ryan. We currently do not undertake ID verification for Universal Credit via email as we need to see the original documents in person. However due to your current circumstances outlined, we can make a reasonable adjustment and conduct verification via a phone call."

Just a few hours later, at 11:59 AM, another manager named Sarah repeated this, explicitly confirming it was their "policy":

Journal Entry: 8 Apr 2025 at 11:59am

"Hi Ryan... You have made us aware you are able to complete processes with PIP and WTC by email but it is not our policy to accept ID verification by email... the other option we have is to book a home visit for you..."

Deconstructing the Excuses

Let's analyse the position the Jobcentre took on this day.

1. The Illogical Phone Offer: Manager Louise offered a phone call as an alternative to "see[ing] the original documents in person." This is a logical absurdity. You cannot visually inspect a passport or a tenancy agreement over the telephone. This wasn't a genuine solution; it was a nonsensical excuse designed to dismiss my request.

2. The "No Policy" Mantra: Both managers insisted they were following policy. Yet while they were repeating this, I was actively citing and sending them the DWP's own official guidance—including documents later obtained via Freedom of Information requests—which proved their position was wrong. These documents clearly state that email must be considered as a reasonable adjustment and that staff should not "outright refuse" it. This wasn't a case of ignorance; it appears to be a case of willfully ignoring the rules.

How Was This Resolved? Legal Action.

For over two months, the Jobcentre refused to budge from their "no email" position, bringing my claim to a standstill. The situation only changed after I was forced to escalate.

On **June 20th, 2025**, having exhausted all other options, I filed a formal discrimination claim in court against the staff members involved.

The effect was immediate. Just five days later, on **June 25th**, the stalemate mysteriously broke. In an email, my Universal Credit Support Officer at Cambridge City Council, Sarah Cafferkey, confirmed that the Jobcentre had suddenly emailed her to verify my identity—the very thing they had spent months insisting was impossible.

Email from Cambridge City Council, June 25th:

"Dear Ryan, I can confirm that I have just received an email from UC asking me to verify your Identification by confirming your tenancy details below. I have just responded and agreed with their statement."

What This Day Proves

April 8th is a crucial date. It provides written proof that DWP staff knowingly enforced an unlawful "policy." More importantly, when connected to the events of June 25th, it shows that this policy was not unbreakable. It was, in fact, instantly abandoned the moment real legal consequences were introduced.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Day in the Journal: April 5th - The Broken System at Day One

A Day in the Journal: April 5th - The Broken System at Day One My Universal Credit claim began on April 5th, 2025. It began with a broken door. The very first, and most critical, step—verifying my identity—was an impossible task designed by a system that doesn't talk to itself. For nearly two hours, I was stuck in a loop, trying to use the GOV.UK Verify system as instructed by the Universal Credit portal. The system repeatedly failed, but I kept trying because the alternative it offered was a telephone call—a method of communication that is extremely difficult for me due to my disabilities. After completing every other section of the application, from housing to health, the system finally logged a crucial, but false, confirmation. The Ghost in the Machine At 11:16 PM on the night my claim was submitted, my Universal Credit journal was updated with a single, misleading line: Journal Entry: 5 Apr 2025 at 11:16pm "Confirm your identity completed" I...
Post a Comment
Read more

Watch failure - Cambridge Jobcentre Plus delays easy fix to housing

The Hidden Scandal: How Cambridge Jobcentre Ignored a Three-Month Mistake Welcome back to Universal Credit hell. Today, we are unpacking another lawless failure from my partner's journal—a simple mistake that Cambridge Jobcentre Plus allowed to cause three months of financial hardship, and a legal request they chose to ignore. The Problem: A Lie Written into the System The situation was straightforward. My partner lives in a shared house with three flatmates. But when Universal Credit calculated her housing costs, they didn't see flatmates. They saw "family members." This wasn't just a clerical error. It was a lie written into the system. It meant that because she was out of work, the DWP's calculation wrongly assumed her "family" would pay her share. Her flatmates were now financially responsible for her in the eyes of the DWP. A bigger problem is that nothing we said could make the Cambridge team understand this basic re...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Day in the Journal: June 10th - The Day My Consent Wasn't Good Enough

A Day in the Journal: June 10th - The Day My Consent Wasn't Good Enough The fight shifted. After the initial battle over my right to use email, Cambridge Jobcentre opened a new front in their war of attrition: consent. I was trying to follow their process. I was trying to get my ID verified via a third party. I was trying to give them the permission they needed. They had a choice: follow their own guidance, use common sense, or invent a new rule. On June 10th, 2025, they chose to invent a new rule. The New Roadblock In a message timed at 12:20 PM, a manager named Carla laid down the new law. She dismissed my repeated attempts to provide consent through my journal. She insisted on a single, slow, and unnecessary method. Direct quote from UC Journal: 10 Jun 2025 at 12:20pm "To progress your Third Party Verification request DWP requires you to complete, sign and return the forms via the return envelope supplied. Whilst email maybe your preferred option this w...
Post a Comment
Read more