Skip to main content

A Day in the Journal: April 5th - The Broken System at Day One

A Day in the Journal: April 5th - The Broken System at Day One

My Universal Credit claim began on April 5th, 2025. It began with a broken door. The very first, and most critical, step—verifying my identity—was an impossible task designed by a system that doesn't talk to itself.

For nearly two hours, I was stuck in a loop, trying to use the GOV.UK Verify system as instructed by the Universal Credit portal. The system repeatedly failed, but I kept trying because the alternative it offered was a telephone call—a method of communication that is extremely difficult for me due to my disabilities.

After completing every other section of the application, from housing to health, the system finally logged a crucial, but false, confirmation.

The Ghost in the Machine

At 11:16 PM on the night my claim was submitted, my Universal Credit journal was updated with a single, misleading line:

Journal Entry: 5 Apr 2025 at 11:16pm

"Confirm your identity completed"

I felt a moment of relief, believing the struggle was over. But this verification was an error, a ghost in the machine. The system had recorded a task as "...completed" which was technically impossible to perform.

The System's Known Failure

The reason I couldn't verify my identity online wasn't my fault. It was because the DWP was instructing me to use a service that they had officially stopped using over a year earlier.

The government's own guidance page on verifying identity for Universal Credit is clear. While it still confusingly talks about online verification, it contains a crucial update at the bottom.

Official DWP Guidance: How to verify your identity for Universal Credit

"Online identity verification... Universal Credit no longer uses Government Gateway or GOV.UK Verify for online verification."

This change was implemented in early 2024.

Why This Day Matters

This wasn't just a technical glitch. This was the system setting me up to fail from the very first interaction. By keeping a defunct verification method as the point of entry and then falsely recording it as complete, the DWP created a situation that was guaranteed to cause problems.

This single, erroneous journal entry on day one became the foundation for the entire battle to come. It was later used as the justification to push me towards telephone calls and in-person appointments, forcing me to fight for a reasonable adjustment that should have been anticipated from the start.

After the being ignored by Cambridge Jobcentre Plus staff, and then ignored by the DWP Legal department - letter before claim PAP - and the draft submission for an injunction, the DWP then ignore any law, or evidence and continued lying.  

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

25 Oct 2025 Ryan v SSWP or Ryan v Cambridge City Council.

I have a dilemma I have only so many spoons. Do I make another High Court Claim for CCC or SSWP or do I just report Carla B to the police? You have my permission to use AI to read this post. I have decided to put a criminal case together for Carla B, the Customer Service Team Leader in the Cambridge Job Centre. I have never done criminal law before. But I do know if two white police officers from Parkside come to your home, to hand deliver a letter, and read it to you (perhaps because you are dyslexic) so that the can personally tell you  that they will not investigate the racist comments made that you  recorded. This is because they asked them and they sad they did not say that. But importantly the police officers have their cameras on, without telling you for their protection (without telling you) which is very criminal. So you smile and show them your partner watching on the IPAD, and later ask for the Video via GDPR. That sort of crime is obvious because is it is very...
Post a Comment
Read more

The litigation campaign for Cambridge and UC Cambridge to treat me fairly is live

Press Release: Official Statement from Ryan FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 27 December 2025 "They Deleted My Health to Evict Me": Ryan Releases Video Evidence of Alleged Council and DWP Deception CAMBRIDGE, UK — I am Ryan, a disabled resident of Cambridge for six years. This press release marks the start of a legal campaign against Cambridge and DWP. The first on has a High Court order holding my claim open until UC finish. I know need second one to get UC to accept my evidence, and Cambridge to stop their possession order. The Campaign This new campaign is necessary because of the lies. First UC lied they could not ID me by email. Now they lie they the cannot accept my evidence in writing. Thus again holding up my rent payment being released. But instead of Canbridge backing my need for UC to make reasonable adjustments, they blame a non interference policy, and then faked a report. The evidence that the report is a lie, is the difference between the report and meeting recorded. The...
Post a Comment
Read more

Watch failure - Cambridge Jobcentre Plus delays easy fix to housing

The Hidden Scandal: How Cambridge Jobcentre Ignored a Three-Month Mistake Welcome back to Universal Credit hell. Today, we are unpacking another lawless failure from my partner's journal—a simple mistake that Cambridge Jobcentre Plus allowed to cause three months of financial hardship, and a legal request they chose to ignore. The Problem: A Lie Written into the System The situation was straightforward. My partner lives in a shared house with three flatmates. But when Universal Credit calculated her housing costs, they didn't see flatmates. They saw "family members." This wasn't just a clerical error. It was a lie written into the system. It meant that because she was out of work, the DWP's calculation wrongly assumed her "family" would pay her share. Her flatmates were now financially responsible for her in the eyes of the DWP. A bigger problem is that nothing we said could make the Cambridge team understand this basic reality. The Inactio...
Post a Comment
Read more