Skip to main content

Cambridgshire police timeline

 


my response to Officer from cambridgeshire police claiming that she cannot provide a copy of my complaint or record it. 


From: Ryan Tremble-Niccolls <ryan.niccolls@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 at 16:24

Subject: Re: Police complaint

To: crtcambs <crtcambs@cambs.police.uk>




Dear PC 2388 Laura Frary,


In response to your email Tuesday 22 September 2026 at 15:27, which contains several misrepresentations of the code, the 2022 Act, and my two complaint(s) dated 2026.09.24 2026.07.21 1550 submission-0975878-065556-20-07-2026 (resent) and 2026.09.03 Police conduct complaint attached. Please follow the regulations and act, 

(a) Log my complaint,

(b) provide me with a copy of the logged complaint, and 

(c) forward it to the IOPC, as it concerns alleged serious misconduct. 


My two complaints - that the police harassed me by repeatedly misrepresenting my rights and deliberately failed to investigate criminal allegations both for and against me - constitute criminal conduct, including perverting the course of justice.


First, "the IOPC only deal with incidents such as death or serious injury or incidents referred to them by a force's Professional Standards Dept." This is a Breach of Referable allegations - Paragraph 4, Schedule 3, Police Reform Act 2002 and Mandatory Referral Criteria - Regulation 4 and 7, Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2020. Under Paragraph 4, Schedule 3, Police Reform Act 2002 there are other criteria to progress a complaint about police misconduct that the officer has omitted. And I materially rely on that.


"9.1...Complaints that must be referred to the IOPC

Appropriate authorities must refer to the IOPC complaints which: • allege that the conduct or other matter complained of has resulted in death or serious injury; • fall within the mandatory referral criteria (see below); or • the IOPC notifies the appropriate authority that it must refer.

Paragraph 4, Schedule 3, Police Reform Act 2002" The Mandatory referral criteria are:

"Mandatory referral criteria - The appropriate authority must refer complaints and recordable conduct matters that include allegations of conduct which constitutes:... • **serious corruption**, including abuse of position ... • a **criminal offence or behaviour which is liable to lead to disciplinary proceedings** and which, in either case, is **aggravated by discriminatory behaviour on the grounds of a person's race**, sex, religion or other status identified in paragraph **9.24 of this guidance** • a **relevant offence** • complaints or conduct matters arising from the same incident as one where conduct falling within the above criteria is alleged; or • **any conduct matter** relating to a chief officer (or the Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service) and **any complaint relating to a chief officer**...Regulation 4 and 7, Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2020" 


Second you said, "If you wish for a copy of the complaint, you will need to go through the Subject Access Request process."


This is wrong, "6.34 Forces and local policing bodies must inform the complainant as soon as is practical that their complaint has been recorded and provide them with a copy of the record that has been made. A copy of the complaint must also be given to the person complained about (if any), unless the force or local policing body considers that to do so might prejudice any criminal investigation or pending proceedings, or would otherwise be contrary to the public interest. This decision must be kept under regular review. The identity of any person may be anonymised in the copy provided."


This is also Breach of Recordable Conduct - Paragraph 13, Schedule 3, Police Reform Act 2002, incudes those falling into the criteria above. 

"What is meant by 'recordable'?


8.15 As shown in the flowchart above, where a conduct matter has not arisen from civil proceedings, the appropriate authority must first consider whether the matter is 'recordable'. . A matter is recordable if it involves allegations of conduct that, assuming it to have taken place:

• appears to have resulted in the death or serious injury of any person • has had an adverse effect on a member of the public, or • meets any of the following criteria:...; iii. serious corruption [is] defined in paragraphs 9.15 - 9.23 of this guidance; iv. a criminal offence or behaviour which is liable to lead to disciplinary proceedings and which in either case was aggravated by discriminatory behaviour on the grounds of a person's race, sex, religion or other status identified in paragraph 9.24 of this guidance; V. a relevant offence (see paragraph 9.28);


Any more course of conduct, whether intentional or not will be persued againts the staff and or the chief constable.


I have attached a copy of my complaint that was made on 29/07/2026. I have attached my second complaint about the conduct of the Camrbodge Polices. Record them and preovidwe me that they have been recorded, and forward them to the IOPC.



2026.07.29_IOPC_appeal_submission-5993521-040557-29-07-2026


2026.09.03 Police conduct complaint whilst investigating CC-31102025-0084 and CC-16022026-0301 (sent).pdf


Kind regards


Ryan Niccolls


On Tue, 22 Sept 2026 at 16:27, crtcambs <crtcambs@cambs.police.uk> wrote:

Good afternoon,

 

I am referring to all complaints you have made to Cambridgeshire Police and the IOPC, as the IOPC only deal with incidents such as death or serious injury or incidents referred to them by a force's Professional Standards Dept. PSD have all the information you have provided and will now handle the complaint moving forward, not CRT.

 

If you wish for a copy of the complaint, you will need to go through the Subject Access Request process.

 

Kind regards

 

Laura Frary

Police Constable 2388 | CRT- Complaints Review Team

People & Professionalism

Cambridgeshire Constabulary

Hinchingbrooke Park,

Huntingdon, PE29 6NP

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube

Working together to deliver an inclusive and professional policing service with: Fairness, Integrity, Diligence and Impartiality

 

 

From: Ryan Tremble-Niccolls <ryan.niccolls@gmail.com> 
Sent: 22 September 2026 15:54
To: crtcambs <crtcambs@cambs.police.uk>
Subject: Re: Police complaint

 


Caution: Someone outside of BCH police sent you this e-mail. You must only click on links or open attachments if you are expecting this e-mail and you trust the sender.

 

Dear Cambridge Police,

 

Can you confirm which complaint you are referring to?

 

Send me a copy of my complaint and a copy of it recorded. 

 

Regards

 

Ryan Tremble-Niccolls

 

Introduce a statutory duty to track and provide notifications for DWP complaints

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/775893

 

On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 at 13:22, crtcambs <crtcambs@cambs.police.uk> wrote:

Good afternoon,

 

We are sorry to hear of your dissatisfaction.

Your complaint has been recorded on our system under reference: CRT/C/00989/2026. 

 

Due to the nature of the allegations this has been passed to our Professional Standards Department (PSD), who will review it and contact you in due course. Please allow up to twenty-eight (28) days for contact from them.

 

If you require support from any agencies other than the police, please use the following link Victim Services Website where you can access a wide range of services providing emotional and practical support.

 

Kind regards

 

Laura Frary

Police Constable 2388 | CRT- Complaints Review Team

People & Professionalism

Cambridgeshire Constabulary

Hinchingbrooke Park,

Huntingdon, PE29 6NP

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube

Working together to deliver an inclusive and professional policing service with: Fairness, Integrity, Diligence and Impartiality

 

 


Internet e-mail is not to be treated as a secure means of communication. Cambridgeshire Constabulary monitors all internet e-mail activity and content. This communication is confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. Please notify the sender if you have received this in error. Unauthorised use or disclosure of the contents may be unlawful. Opinions expressed in this document may not be official policy.

For more details please see Cambridgeshire Constabulary Privacy Policy 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

25 Oct 2025 Ryan v SSWP or Ryan v Cambridge City Council.

I have a dilemma I have only so many spoons. Do I make another High Court Claim for CCC or SSWP or do I just report Carla B to the police? You have my permission to use AI to read this post. I have decided to put a criminal case together for Carla B, the Customer Service Team Leader in the Cambridge Job Centre. I have never done criminal law before. But I do know if two white police officers from Parkside come to your home, to hand deliver a letter, and read it to you (perhaps because you are dyslexic) so that the can personally tell you  that they will not investigate the racist comments made that you  recorded. This is because they asked them and they sad they did not say that. But importantly the police officers have their cameras on, without telling you for their protection (without telling you) which is very criminal. So you smile and show them your partner watching on the IPAD, and later ask for the Video via GDPR. That sort of crime is obvious because is it is very...

Formal complaint to GLD DWP, SRA, and Cilex,

Formal complaint to GLD DWP, SRA, and Cilex, Dated 12 June 2026 by email  Encl 9 June 2025 DWP Submission to high court by GLD DWP stating that email cannot be used. 25 June 2025 Cambridge email identifying me by email Dear GLD, SRA and Cilex I am writing to complain about the GLD DWP staff interfering in my claim for disability access to Universal Credit. Ironically, to deny my access to UC, they are also denying me access to a court. As well as misleading me, they have misled DWP staff in jobcentres. This has likely led to deaths because the advice was woefully incorrect. My guess is that say whatever they want, because they have the court. This is based on a first-hand conversation from the court staff and the outrageous claims made. Expanded below, these quotes are wrong in law. PIP regulation 88 does not exist. They claim that the DWP is immune from the Equality Act 2010. And that because the DWP is an employer t...

The litigation campaign for Cambridge and UC Cambridge to treat me fairly is live

Press Release: Official Statement from Ryan FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 27 December 2025 "They Deleted My Health to Evict Me": Ryan Releases Video Evidence of Alleged Council and DWP Deception CAMBRIDGE, UK — I am Ryan, a disabled resident of Cambridge for six years. This press release marks the start of a legal campaign against Cambridge and DWP. The first on has a High Court order holding my claim open until UC finish. I know need second one to get UC to accept my evidence, and Cambridge to stop their possession order. The Campaign This new campaign is necessary because of the lies. First UC lied they could not ID me by email. Now they lie they the cannot accept my evidence in writing. Thus again holding up my rent payment being released. But instead of Canbridge backing my need for UC to make reasonable adjustments, they blame a non interference policy, and then faked a report. The evidence that the report is a lie, is the difference between the report and meeting recorded. The...