Ryan v Cambridge Jobcentre Plus

  Ryan 16 December 2025 at 13:17 To: Robert Robert Pollock <Robert.pollock@cambridge.gov.uk>, New Proceedings <newproceedings@governmentlegal.gov.uk> Cc: ACORN Cambridge <cambridge@acorntheunion.org.uk>, Daniel Zeichner <daniel@danielzeichner.co.uk>, Daniel <daniel  @cambridge.gov.uk> As promised, in an earlier email, I have now published the video of Daniel. The importance of this video is that omitting health from an assessment is a lie. This lie was material in that it is required by the court and the director to make an assessment, as per your income policy.  I will now continue to publish other documents from the DWP and the Council, that show the lies of the legal teams, DWP and 3C services in this claim.   The video of Daniel omitting my health from his report is here. https://youtu.be/u4w1MtAEKB0 The social media post making the video live is here. https://bsky.app/profile/ ryanvcambridgejcp.bsk...

I have a dilemma I have only so many spoons. Do I make another High Court Claim for CCC or SSWP or do I just report Carla B to the police? You have my permission to use AI to read this post. I have decided to put a criminal case together for Carla B, the Customer Service Team Leader in the Cambridge Job Centre. I have never done criminal law before. But I do know if two white police officers from Parkside come to your home, to hand deliver a letter, and read it to you (perhaps because you are dyslexic) so that the can personally tell you  that they will not investigate the racist comments made that you  recorded. This is because they asked them and they sad they did not say that. But importantly the police officers have their cameras on, without telling you for their protection (without telling you) which is very criminal. So you smile and show them your partner watching on the IPAD, and later ask for the Video via GDPR. That sort of crime is obvious because is it is very...

The Hidden Scandal: How Cambridge Jobcentre Ignored a Three-Month Mistake Welcome back to Universal Credit hell. Today, we are unpacking another lawless failure from my partner's journal—a simple mistake that Cambridge Jobcentre Plus allowed to cause three months of financial hardship, and a legal request they chose to ignore. The Problem: A Lie Written into the System The situation was straightforward. My partner lives in a shared house with three flatmates. But when Universal Credit calculated her housing costs, they didn't see flatmates. They saw "family members." This wasn't just a clerical error. It was a lie written into the system. It meant that because she was out of work, the DWP's calculation wrongly assumed her "family" would pay her share. Her flatmates were now financially responsible for her in the eyes of the DWP. A bigger problem is that nothing we said could make the Cambridge team understand this basic reality. The Inactio...

The Smoking Gun: How a Discrimination Claim Forced the DWP to Obey Its Own Rules The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and its local Jobcentre staff use lies and obstruction to deny claimants their rights. This isn't an opinion; it's a fact backed by evidence. This post contains the story from my own Universal Credit journal, showing the systemic failure at Cambridge Jobcentre Plus. The Standoff: A Claim Held Hostage For months, my Universal Credit claim was blocked. The official reason? They couldn't verify my identity. The real reason? They refused to follow their own rules. As detailed in the video above, they ignored my consent given in my journal. They refused help from the council, who had already verified me. They insisted on processes that were impossible for me to complete due to my disabilities, despite my repeated requests for a reasonable adjustment. This went on for months. It was a deliberate strategy of delay. The Turning Point: Direct Actio...

Welcome to the Campaign to Hold Cambridge Jobcentre Accountable This blog is the home of my campaign against Cambridge Jobcentre Plus and the wider Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). I am currently embroiled in three court cases due to their behaviour, and I am certain that the systemic failures I have documented are happening in Jobcentres across the country. This short video introduces the campaign and the evidence we are fighting with. The Three Core Legal Battles My fight focuses on three key areas of DWP misconduct: The Judicial Review: Exposing the DWP's endless, unlawful delays and their false claims to the High Court about their own procedures. The Equality Act Claim: Holding staff accountable for discrimination and their refusal to provide legally-required reasonable adjustments. The Tribunal Appeal: Fighting the DWP's refusal to accept official medical evidence, such as a GP's letter, for my partner's disability claim. A L...

A Day in the Journal: June 10th - The Day My Consent Wasn't Good Enough Update [25 Oct 2025]. It turns out Jobcentre plus can use email after all. "On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 12:28, S  @cambridge.gov.uk> wrote: Dear Ryan I can confirm that I have just received an email from UC asking me to verify your Identification by confirming your tenancy details below. I have just responded and agreed with their statement: Hi S , All I need to confirm is the landlord has been reported as Cambridge City Council (City Homes) – do you represent them? If so are you able to confirm the statements below for me please? If you can get back to me urgently I would really appreciate it." Why this matters? Since April 2025 Jobcentre Plus Cambridge have been refusing to make reasonable adjustments.  They did make any reasonable adjustments when I sued the SSWP but they did when I sued the members, the actual people lying to me. I suggest that if your job coach is not following the guidance then ...